Related
Summary
Comedy sequels are less dependable than any other genre , and some classic comedy flick should have been left as standalone movies . A movie ’s financial success often dictate whether it start out a sequel or not , but there have been enough underwhelming comedy continuation to evidence that tale concerns should take anteriority . Great comedies often provide staring endings for their characters which show them overcoming whatever humourous fault has been holding them back , spend a penny a sequel unnecessary .
dear clowning sequels are rare , andgood clowning franchiseseven more so . This is because comedy picture show swear on surprisal and novelty . Once both of these wear off , the characters might lose their appeal . funniness characters are usually specifically crafted for their write up . This is also reliable of characters in other genre , but they tend to be capable to slot into new plots with ease . Characters like Austin Powers and Ron Burgundy were n’t design for multiple different stories . If they were , they would in all likelihood be on TV .
Some great comedy movie continuation successfully sustain the essence of their forerunner while taking bold novel risks , which is not very wanton .
10The Hangover (2009)
Sequels: The Hangover Part II (2011) & The Hangover Part III (2013)
Cast
The firstHangoverhas a brilliant original premise , and it back this up with a great script and fun performances all round . The Hangover ’s unspoiled quotesare divvy up among the cast . Bradley Cooper play the grouping ’s leader , Ed Helms is the hopeless mental case , and Zach Galifianakis is the unhinged wildcard . This trio strike up a neat dynamic as they struggle to set up together the events of their savage bachelor company the night prior .
Although the first movie turn so well because the character are put away into a bizarre situation , it is n’t so bizarre the 2nd and third sentence around
The Hangoverincorporates elements of mystery story and action as the wolf pack ’s investigating takes them to surprising Modern places . The sequels could n’t live up to this element of surprisal . Although the first motion picture works so well because the character are flung into a bizarre situation , it is n’t so flakey the 2d and third time around , so the sequels attempt to compensate by becoming more crass and ramping up the shock economic value . The firstHangovermovie is about a once - in - a - life event , but the subsequence repeat the exact same conception .
9Austin Powers: International Man Of Mystery (1997)
Sequels: Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me (1999) & Austin Powers in Goldmember (2002)
Austin Powersmay be the authoritative James Bond parody , and there has been an teemingness of contenders since Sean Connery first donned the famous dinner jacket forDr . Noin 1962.Austin Powerssucceeds where so many other parodies fail by showing a true honey for Bond . It pokes fun at the melodramatic excess of Bond villains and the secret agent ’s taste for cockeyed convenience , but it ’s ultimately a fun escapade asterisk a appealing quality . In this way , it functions the same as most actual Bond moving picture .
International Man of Mysterysaid all there is to say about 007 , so the sequels had to come up with new joke that did n’t work quite as well .
Each subsequent Austin Powers film load the success of the first . International Man of Mysterysaid all there is to say about 007 , so the continuation had to make out up with raw gags that did n’t work quite as well . Mike Myers ' performance are just as fun to follow in the subsequence , but parodies ordinarily work best in small explosion . There may be 25 Bond moving-picture show to satirize , butInternational Man of Mysterymade the most stinging jape at the first attempt .
8Zoolander (2001)
Sequel: Zoolander 2 (2016)
Zoolandercould have used a subsequence soon after the first movie derive out . There ’s no guarantee this would have been a success , but it would have been much more successful thanZoolander 2,which came 15 years later . By the time the subsequence finally roll up around , the ethnic moment whichZoolandersought to satirize was long gone . The sequel tried to take a swipe at the unexampled era of renown obsession via social sensitive , but it did n’t shoot down many of its jape .
By the prison term the sequel eventually wave around , the cultural moment whichZoolandersought to satirise was long gone .
Zoolanderis a simple story about two really , really , ridiculously beneficial - looking manlike models who put their precious few brainpower cell together to foil a dastardly fashionista ’s plot to assassinate the Prime Minister of Malaysia . It ’s a merriment espionage plot of ground with two loveable idiots seek to save the earthly concern , but a sequel was never necessary . The jokes about the apart niche of virile supermodels did n’t have the legs for another movie , andZoolander 2tried to even off for this with an endless parade of meaningless fame cameo .
7Airplane! (1980)
Sequel: Airplane II: The Sequel (1982)
Airplaneis one of the most repeatable clowning ever , with Leslie Nielsen in particular on top form as the doctor aboard a rider spirt heading toward a disaster . Nielsen also worked with the comedy filmmaking trio of Zucker , Abrahams and Zucker for theNaked Gunmovies , but while this hard - boiled tec parody well set up a franchise , Airplaneshould have been a standalone movie .
The emotional tension of the first movie was amply resolved by the end , meaning that there was no compelling reason to bring the characters back .
Airplaneparodies melodramatic cataclysm movie , and since disaster moving-picture show so rarely have sequels , Airplanecould well have give up at just one film . More importantly , the emotional tenseness of the first movie was fully resolved by the end , meaning that there was no compelling reason to lend the characters back . Zucker , Abrahams and Zucker turn down the chance to yield forAirplane II : The Sequel .
6Monsters, Inc. (2001)
Sequel: Monsters University (2013)
Pixar has had a patchy record with sequel so far . While theToy Storyfranchise has turned out a string of hits , other sequels have been less democratic . find DoryandIncredibles 2both failed to strike the heights of their predecessor , butMonsters Universitymay be the biggest letdown of the luck . The prequel might have been condemn from its origination , sinceMonsters , Incis such a perfect standalone fry ’s picture .
Sully and Mike ’s friendly relationship is pushed to break point by the introduction of Boo , but the write up render a rattling excited issue .
monstrosity , Incis a giant movie put-on , a history of two mismatched friends and a workplace comedy all rolled into one . Sully and Mike ’s friendship is push to breaking dot by the founding of Boo , but the news report provide a wonderful worked up payoff . Not only do the characters learn more about themselves and each other , but they are able to instruct the entire world of monsters that pock tike is no longer necessary . This meanta sequel was pointless , and the prequel that followed was just as unneeded . Pixar ’s upcoming moviesare a premix of continuation and original report .
5Mary Poppins (1964)
Sequel: Mary Poppins Returns (2018)
Mary Poppinsis synonymous with the trick of classic Disney film . The melodic fable is a blithe children ’s clowning with raft of jokes , but it also has a affectionate emotional core that imply it can make audiences cry as well as laugh . The ending was a perfectly semisweet send - off for the wizard nanny , who left the Banks children happy than she found them as she float off to her next risky venture .
The ending was a perfectly bittersweet send - off for the wizard nursemaid , who left the Banks tiddler happier than she found them .
Although this close , illustration of the loss of childhood innocence , shut the door to any possible sequel , Mary Poppins came back over 50 years later . Mary Poppins Returnsmakes the most of a tough berth . It ’s a subsequence that nobody called for , but it still captures some of the nonphysical charm that make the original so popular . Mary Poppins Returnsis a very rare case of an unnecessary sequel surpassing expectations , even if it did n’t live up to the lofty criterion of the original .
4Legally Blonde (2001)
Sequel: Legally Blonde 2: Red, White & Blonde (2003) & Legally Blondes (2009)
Elle Woods became an insistent icon of female empowerment when the firstLegally Blondemovie was released . She enroll in Harvard Law School to prove her ex - boyfriend wrong , but she ended up discovering that proving something to herself was much more of import . She gets her well-chosen finish as the category valedictorian , having successfully mount a sound demurrer that help an innocent womanhood ride out out of prison . Her transformation is complete , but a sequel was given the green Inner Light all the same .
Elle ’s transformation is terminated at the end of the first moving-picture show , but a continuation was given the green light yet .
Now , the dealership seems to be coming back from the dead , with aLegally Blondeprequel television set showand a third flick asterisk Reese Witherspoon both in the whole kit and boodle . This suggests that Witherspoon has in the end found an interesting way to continue the reference ’s journey over 20 years later , because her political lobbying inLegally Blonde 2was not what fans wanted to see .
3Men In Black (1997)
Sequels: Men in Black II (2002), Men in Black 3 (2012) & MIB: International (2019)
During the 1990s and 2000s , Will Smith was an unstoppable box office sensation . WhenMen in Blackbecame a smash collision , a sequel always made fiscal sensation , even if it was n’t necessary . man in Blackfollows Agent J ’s journeying as he goes from an ordinary NYPD cop to one of the guardians of Earth ’s peace of mind amid a universe teeming with hostile life . The sci - fi escapade end with him quick to mentor the next generation of recruits .
Jones is the idealistic straight man to look at with Smith ’s madcap style . However , their delicious chemistry was n’t a good enough reason to bring them back together for a sequel .
Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones are an improbable duo inMen in Black , but they develop a screaming dynamic . Jones is the ideal unbowed mankind to deal with Smith ’s madcap flair . However , their delightful chemistry was n’t a practiced enough reason to wreak them back together for a sequel . Men in Black IIhad to undo Agent K ’s happy ending and drop him back into the ring . Not only did the sequel fail to live up to the touchstone of the first motion picture , but it also undercut its most worked up moment .
2Ghostbusters (1984)
Sequels: Ghostbusters II (1989), Ghostbusters (2016), Ghostbusters: Afterlife (2021) & Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire (2024)
TheGhostbustersfranchisehas surpassed $ 1 billion at the box office , so the sequels certainly make near fiscal sense , even though the level of the original movie would have worked on its own . The rest period of the franchise has been struggling to forge a fresh identity , and it has never matched up to the whacky , lovable funniness of the first movie . The more recent movies are a small less comedic and a little more concerned with spectacle .
The quietus of the enfranchisement has been struggle to forge a new identity , and it has never matched up to the goofy , loveable comedy of the first movie .
It ’s no marvel that it ’s been hard to match the originalGhostbustersin full term of critical answer . Although there are elements of horror , mystery and dark fantasy , Ghostbustersdefies simple categorization upon closer inspection . The root word and the message of the film are obscure behind the comedy . Ghostbusterscould be seen as a film about friendly relationship , individualism or courage , but it ’s mostly just a platform for some peachy comedic player to have a lot of supernatural fun busting spirits .
1Anchorman: The Legend Of Ron Burgundy (2004)
Sequel: Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues (2013)
Will Ferrell ’s best moviesindulge his over - the - top comedic persona , andAnchormandoes just this while also ring him with a mold that can keep up . Ferrell stars as Ron Burgundy , a self - interested 1970s TV word anchor who enjoys his place in a male person - reign industry . His blissful existence is shake up when he and his newsworthiness squad are force to receive a female co - anchorman , meet by Christina Applegate .
The fictitious character are all hilarious , and they bounce off one another brilliantly , but they were design for the story , and no sequel could ever make them feel as relevant or lively .
Anchormanmakes play of a very specific cultural moment , andits fictional character are not mean to defend literal people . Each phallus of the news squad is a ludicrous caricature of maleness . Brick is a privileged dolt , Brian is a egotistic hound dog , and Champ ’s only emotional connection is to sports . Ron is their leader , an ignorant shaver who call up he ’s cultured and alien . These characters are all screaming , and they bounce off one another brilliantly , but they were designed for the story , and no subsequence could ever make them feel as relevant or vital . Anchorman 2certainly did n’t .
